Two Scores, One Direction
Every time you step on Hype Scale, the app receives two composite outputs that go beyond individual metrics: your health assessment level and your body type classification. The health assessment level (0 to 4: Potential Risk, Sub-health, Average, Good, Very Good) synthesises multiple BIA values into a single wellness indicator. The body type classification places you in a fat-and-muscle matrix that immediately reveals your body composition architecture. Together, these two outputs give you a personalised starting point rather than raw numbers you need to interpret yourself.
How Hype Uses Health Assessment Level
The health assessment level in Hype feeds directly into your Nutrition pillar score, influencing your daily health rating in the app dashboard. When your health assessment level improves — say from Sub-health to Average, or from Average to Good — the Nutrition pillar responds, reflecting the genuine improvement in your underlying body composition. The app shows your current level prominently after each weigh-in and displays the historical trend so you can see whether your level has been stable, improving, or declining over the past 30 and 90 days. This trend matters more than any single day's reading.
How Hype Uses Body Type Classification
Your body type classification in Hype appears in the composition detail view and is colour-coded for instant interpretation — thin-fat types see a prompt indicating the direction to focus on (muscle building), while muscular-fat types see fat reduction flagged as the priority. The classification also influences goal suggestions when you set up or update your health goals in the app. If your classification is thin-fat, Hype will suggest resistance training frequency targets. If it is muscular-fat, it will suggest caloric management. The classification changes visually over time as your BIA data improves, providing a satisfying marker of progress that complements the numerical measurements.
Connecting Both Scores to Your Journey
The combination of health assessment level and body type classification creates a two-dimensional map of where you are and where to go. Here is how to read the combination.
- Sub-health level + thin-fat classification: highest priority combination — focus on resistance training and protein intake, track monthly and expect to see both scores improve over 60 to 90 days
- Average level + muscular-fat classification: good muscle foundation but fat reduction is needed — a modest caloric deficit with continued resistance training typically moves both scores within 90 days
- Good level + average classification: healthy baseline — maintain current habits and use the data to prevent age-related muscle loss as your primary concern going forward
- Very Good level + thin-muscular classification: optimal — shift goals to performance, sport, or longevity metrics and use Hype data primarily as a maintenance and early warning tool
Watching Your Classification Change Over Time
Hype stores every health assessment level and body type classification from your BIA scale syncs and displays them in a historical timeline. Setting a 90-day review date when you begin a new training and nutrition approach creates an accountability checkpoint. The satisfaction of seeing your body type move from thin-fat to average, or your health assessment level advance from Sub-health to Good, is a powerful motivator that numerical measurements alone often fail to provide. The Hype app turns these two composite scores into the most visible markers of your journey.
References
- Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, et al. "Bioelectrical impedance analysis — part I: review of principles and methods." Clinical Nutrition, 2004; 23(5): 1226-1243. [Link]
- Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, et al. "Healthy percentage body fat ranges." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000; 72(3): 694-701. [Link]
- Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC. "Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas." British Journal of Nutrition, 1991; 65(2): 105-114. [Link]
- Otten JJ, Hellwig JP, Meyers LD (eds). "Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements." National Academies Press, 2006. [Link]
- Schoenfeld BJ. "The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2010; 24(10): 2857-2872. [Link]
- Romero-Corral A, et al. "Normal weight obesity: a risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulation." European Heart Journal, 2010; 31(6): 737-746. [Link]